Uncategorized

“It Was Designed to Kill”? Dr. Peter McCullough’s Allison Inquiry Testimony

Dr. Peter McCullough told the Allison Inquiry that an mRNA “bio weapon” was “designed to kill.” This article examines the claim, its context and the evidence still required.

McCULLOUGH TESTIMONY: ALLISON INQUIRY

Editor’s note: Dr. Peter McCullough’s statement is an allegation about intentional harm, not a court finding. The government and manufacturers should answer it with documents and evidence—not slogans, censorship or demands that Canadians simply trust official assurances.

The testimony

McCullough was listed as a Day 4 witness at the Allison Inquiry in Ottawa on September 11, 2026. During his testimony, he said that the mRNA product or “bio weapon” was “designed to kill.” That claim should trigger evidence preservation and an independent investigation. Automatic dismissal is not accountability.

What the public has a right to know

  • Who funded and directed the relevant research?
  • What did officials and manufacturers know about safety signals?
  • When were concerns raised, and how were they handled?
  • Were warnings, data or adverse-event reports withheld or minimized?
  • Who made the decisions, and who benefited from them?

Why criminal investigations should be considered

If evidence showed that people knowingly concealed serious risks, falsified information, or authorized a product with an intent to cause death or serious harm, the matter could go beyond political criticism. Police and prosecutors should assess whether any Canadian offence may apply, including criminal negligence, fraud, conspiracy or obstruction. The proper standard is evidence—not outrage and not immunity for officials.

A trial should be held only if an independent authority lays charges supported by admissible evidence. But refusing to investigate credible allegations would be its own accountability failure. The public should demand preservation of records, disclosure of the evidence and an independent review.

People reporting serious injuries should not be erased from the record

People who report serious injuries deserve medical care, a fair hearing and a transparent investigation. The government cannot dismiss them as misinformation while refusing to release the records needed to test their claims.

Sources

Watch Dr. McCullough’s testimony

Dr. Peter McCullough is listed among the Day 4 witnesses. Watch the associated Day 4 hearing recording below and review the full context before drawing conclusions about his claims.

Source archive: Allison Inquiry / Covid Testimony Association.